Fascinating (if unsurprising) Similarities

I recently read The Victorian Internet by Tom Standage.  The book was set up to draw parallels between the telegraph and the Internet, and it did so admirably.  The themes that emerge there certainly appear to be themes related to ICTs and their relationships to society.  Today, I read an article that filled in another gap in this pattern.  Chronologically, the telephone comes between the telegraph and the Internet.  Some excerpts from Stanley Aronson’s “The Sociology of the Telephone”.*

A discussion of the social effect of the telephone would, however, be incomplete were reference to its relationship to other modes of communication omitted.  In the absence of research one can only suggest these relationships through a series of questions: Does telephone communication lessen or increase total face-to-face communication?  Does it supplement or replace the latter?  How does telephone communication change the character of face-to-face and written communications?  What effects has use of the telephone had on the rate of use of the telegraph and on the letter writing habits of Americans?

These are all questions that have been, in one way or another, asked and answered about the Internet.  I’m not grounded enough in the literature on the telephone to know if they were answered in that arena (though I suspect there are probably answers in Katz’s Connections, which is sitting in the study with me right now - I read exerpts of it several years ago but haven’t revisited it recently).  Standage raised many of the same issues in The Victorian Internet as well, as well as touching on the effects of the telegraph on business (as Aronson does), as a mass medium (as Aronson does; I had never been aware of the use of the telephone as a mass medium, but it apparently was), and so on.

*Aronson, Sidney H.  1971.  The Sociology of the Telephone.  International Journal of Comparative Sociology 12(3): 153-167.

Tools of the trade

I’ve been building my cache of writing tools. I do my actual writing in Word, but I’ve been experimenting with a variety of complements to it, supposedly to enhance my productivity.

• For citation management: For a long time I used EndNote, but I’ve recently become a bit disenchanted with it. I’ve been using the free trial of BookEnds for about six weeks now and I love it. I’ll be buying the full version sometime in the very near future. (I’m probably going to hit my 50-source limit today.)
• For note-taking, brainstorming, and general organizing: My friend Jen recommended VoodooPad a while back and I’ve been loving it. I’m actually using VoodooPad Lite — which does everything I really want it to for FREE!
• For diagramming: Last week I was lamenting the lack of graphics software on the newly-wiped-and-reinstalled X2, and Jeremy recommended OmniGraffle. I fell in love instantaneously. Again, free (but you can only do diagrams with up to 20 elements).
• For outlining: Eloisa came with OmniOutliner already installed. I hadn’t messed with it much, but since I liked OmniGraffle so much, I figured I’d give it a spin as I outline my theory section. So far I’m liking it. I can actually see using it for reading notes, since I tend to think about such things in outline-type form. We shall see.
• For procrastination: WordPress. For blogging about my tools, of course. :^D

That is all.

Friday’s progress

was not great, because my beloved Eloisa came back from Apple repair un-repaired. A trip to the Genius Bar at my nearest Apple Store yielded the following conclusion:

Ain’t nothing that can be done about it. Some MBP’s just have a whine. It’s the processor. Deal.

And so dealing I am. (If anybody cares, I’m quite happy with QuietMBP to deal with the situation.) I wish they’d just told me that over the phone rather than me sending it in, but what can ya do.